Red Hat JBoss Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
Exploited since 2022-05-25. No WAF vendor names it yet. Our CRS test: not blocked.
The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows… More
The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET handler by using a different method.
Edge coverage
Claimed by vendorsAsk Vigil
AI · answers from this pageWorkers AI (Llama 3.3). Can be wrong: check the cited source.
Severity, decoded
CVSS 3.1Exploitable over the network under specific conditions, with no privileges and no user interaction, leading to low impact on integrity.
How the score is built
- Attack vectorAn attacker can reach it over the internet; no access to your network needed.Network
- Attack complexityThe attack only works when conditions outside the attacker's control line up.High
- Privileges requiredNo account or login is needed.None
- User interactionNo one has to click or open anything; the attack works on its own.None
- ScopeThe damage stays within the vulnerable component.Unchanged
- Confidentiality impactNo data is exposed.None
- Integrity impactAn attacker can change some data, but with limited control or limited effect.Low
- Availability impactThe component keeps working normally.None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NAttackers are exploiting this in the wild.
At least one step needs hands-on work, which slows mass attacks.
A successful attack gives limited control over the affected software or limited access to its data.
Public exploits
12 found- MetasploitJBoss JMX Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deployment2010-04-26 · exploit · rank Excellent
- MetasploitJBoss Java Class DeploymentFileRepository WAR Deployment2010-04-26 · exploit · rank Excellent
- MetasploitJBoss JMX Console Deployer Upload and Execute2007-02-20 · exploit · rank Excellent
- MetasploitJBoss JMX Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deploymentauxiliary · rank Normal
- MetasploitJBoss JMX Console DeploymentFileRepository WAR Upload and Deploymentauxiliary · rank Normal
- MetasploitJBoss Vulnerability Scannerauxiliary · rank Normal
- MetasploitSAP URL Scannerauxiliary · rank Normal
- Exploit-DBJBoss & JMX Console - Misconfigured Deployment Scanner2011-10-03 · webapps · jsp
- Exploit-DBJBoss Application Server 4.2 < 4.2.0.CP09 / 4.3 < 4.3.0.CP08 - Remote Command Execution2011-03-04 · webapps · jsp · verified
- Exploit-DBJBoss JMX - Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deployment (Metasploit)2011-01-10 · remote · multiple · verified
- Exploit-DBJBoss - Java Class DeploymentFileRepository WAR Deployment (Metasploit)2010-08-03 · remote · multiple · verified
- NucleiCVE-2010-0738.yamldetection template, replayed in our lab
Links are to third-party code: never run it outside an isolated lab.
Timeline
- 2007-02-20Metasploit module publishedJBoss JMX Console Deployer Upload and Execute
- 2010-04-28CVE publishedCVE List
- 2010-08-03Exploit published on Exploit-DBJBoss - Java Class DeploymentFileRepository WAR Deployment (Metasploit)
- 2022-05-25Added to CISA KEVConfirmed exploitation in the wild
- 2026-11-02Our test: OWASP Core Rule Set let it throughparanoia level 1, anomaly threshold 5, default CRS settings
- 2026-11-02Our test: OWASP Core Rule Set let it throughparanoia level 2, anomaly threshold 5, default CRS settings
Vendor statements
QuotedCloudflareWAF Managed Rules
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
AWSAWS WAF Managed Rules
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
Microsoft AzureFront Door and Application Gateway WAF (DRS)
We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. The rule tables name CVEs but carry no dates, so Azure is left out of every time-to-rule figure.
Google CloudCloud Armor preconfigured WAF rules
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
FastlyNext-Gen WAF virtual patches
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
F5Attack signatures (Distributed Cloud WAF)
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
AkamaiApp & API Protector (Adaptive Security Engine)
This vendor publishes no machine-readable rule changelog we can check.
OWASP CRSCore Rule Set (open source, used inside many WAFs)
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
Social
No posts seen yet on X, Bluesky, Mastodon, Hacker News or GitHub.