Vigilbase CVEConnect your agent

Microsoft Win32k Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

Known exploitedExploited · KEV 2022-03-15Public exploit codeCVE-2019-1132

Exploited since 2022-03-15. No WAF vendor names it yet.

Edge rules
0/8
Our test
No exploit yet
CVSS
7.8
EPSS
9.9% Top 4%
Posts, 14d
02026-10-22: 0 posts2026-10-23: 0 posts2026-10-24: 0 posts2026-10-25: 0 posts2026-10-26: 0 posts2026-10-27: 0 posts2026-10-28: 0 posts2026-10-29: 0 posts2026-10-30: 0 posts2026-10-31: 0 posts2026-11-01: 0 posts2026-11-02: 0 posts2026-11-03: 0 posts2026-11-04: 0 posts
Published
2019-07-29

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'.

Known exploitedLast checked 2026-11-04

The risk

CISA lists CVE-2019-1132 as exploited in the wild since 2022-03-15. Exploit code is published on Exploit-DB. No edge WAF vendor names it in a changelog, so default managed rules may or may not catch it.

Who is affected

Teams running Microsoft Windows (7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1; 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1) and Microsoft Windows Server (2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation); 2008 R2 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 1; 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1; more in the CVE record).

Next steps

  1. Find the version you run. In PowerShell (build and latest updates):
    Get-ComputerInfo -Property OsName, OsBuildNumber; Get-HotFix | Sort-Object InstalledOn -Descending | Select-Object -First 5
  2. Apply the vendor's fix; the advisory lists the affected and fixed versions.
  3. CISA's required action: Apply updates per vendor instructions. US federal agencies must act by 2022-04-05.
  4. Review exposed instances for signs of compromise: it was exploited before many systems were patched, and a later patch does not undo access already gained.
  5. Do not rely on WAF defaults: no edge vendor names this CVE. Restrict access to the vulnerable component or add a custom rule until it is patched. Edge coverage
  6. Check which WAF sits in front of your site and whether it covers this CVE. Check your domain

Attack traffic on Cloudflare

Cloudflare Radar
  • Rules for named CVEs5.9% of mitigated layer 7 attacks, 7 days2026-10-06: 0.6%2026-10-07: 1.8%2026-10-08: 3%2026-10-09: 6.3%2026-10-10: 1.9%2026-10-11: 0.8%2026-10-12: 0.6%2026-10-13: 0.6%2026-10-14: 4.2%2026-10-15: 2.3%2026-10-16: 1.3%2026-10-17: 1.6%2026-10-18: 1.1%2026-10-19: 3.2%2026-10-20: 4.7%2026-10-21: 5.7%2026-10-22: 5.5%2026-10-23: 9.8%2026-10-24: 7%2026-10-25: 5%2026-10-26: 7.3%2026-10-27: 8.1%2026-10-28: 10.1%2026-10-29: 0.9%2026-10-30: 4.1%2026-10-31: 7.5%2026-11-01: 8.7%2026-11-02: 2.4%2026-11-03: 9.1%

Radar groups Cloudflare's WAF managed rules by category; it does not publish counts per CVE. These shares show how much attack traffic targets this kind of flaw across Cloudflare's network (28-day trend). They are not compromised systems, and seeing few attempts on Cloudflare does not prove an absence elsewhere. Radar data as of 2026-11-03. Radar ↗

Check your exposure with an agent

Read-only

Copy this into an agent with access to your infrastructure. It asks for an evidence-based, read-only assessment: affected systems, exposure, compensating controls and what is still unknown. It does not scan or change anything by itself.

Prompt12 lines
Assess whether the infrastructure available to you is affected by CVE-2019-1132 (Microsoft Win32k Privilege Escalation Vulnerability). Perform a read-only assessment within your authorized access. Do not send exploit traffic, scan third-party systems, change configuration or restart services.

1. Verify the CVE record at https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1132 and the vendor advisory. Establish affected and fixed versions, including vendor backports. The record lists: Microsoft Windows: affected 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1; 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 | Microsoft Windows Server: affected 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation); 2008 R2 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 1; 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1; 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation). Cite sources and retrieval dates; flag anything you cannot verify.
2. Inventory deployments of Microsoft Win32k: asset, environment, owner where known, installed version or build, and how you confirmed it (package metadata, a version endpoint, image tags), e.g. `Get-ComputerInfo -Property OsName, OsBuildNumber; Get-HotFix | Sort-Object InstalledOn -Descending | Select-Object -First 5` (in PowerShell (build and latest updates)). An image tag alone does not prove the running version.
3. Identify which deployments are reachable from the internet or untrusted networks, and through which paths (direct origin, load balancer, CDN or WAF).
4. Assess compensating controls separately from patch status. Current edge WAF coverage for this CVE: no edge WAF vendor names it. Live data: https://cve.vigilbase.com/api/v1/cves/CVE-2019-1132. Check whether the rule is enabled and in block mode on each path, and whether any path bypasses the WAF. A WAF rule is not a patch.
5. It is known exploited (CISA KEV): review logs on exposed instances for signs of exploitation before and after patching.

Return a short summary and a table: asset | version/build | assessment (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | exposure | compensating control | evidence | next action. List what you could not assess and the access needed to resolve it. Do not infer absence of compromise from patch status or a lack of alerts.

Remediation guidance: Apply the vendor's fix; the advisory lists the affected and fixed versions. CISA's required action: Apply updates per vendor instructions. US federal agencies must act by 2022-04-05.
More: https://cve.vigilbase.com/cve/CVE-2019-1132

Sources

Cited
CVE record

CVSS 3.1 7.8 (high).

CISA KEV

Added 2022-03-15, federal due date 2022-04-05 (catalog 2026.11.03, checked 2026-11-04).

EPSS

9.87% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 95% of CVEs (2026-11-02).

WAF vendor statements

No edge vendor changelog names it.

Ask Vigil

AI · answers from this page
Ask about CVE-2019-1132: who's covered, what to patch first, how vendors compare. I cite sources and won't help with attacks.

Severity, decoded

CVSS 3.1
High · 7.8 / 10

Exploitable with local access, with low privileges and no user interaction, leading to full loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability.

Needs local accessAny user loginNo user actionWorks reliablyFull compromise
How the score is built8 metrics
  • Attack vectorAn attacker needs local access, or must trick a user into opening something on the machine.
    Local
  • Attack complexityNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
    Low
  • Privileges requiredThe attacker needs an ordinary user account.
    Low
  • User interactionNo one has to click or open anything; the attack works on its own.
    None
  • ScopeThe damage stays within the vulnerable component.
    Unchanged
  • Confidentiality impactAn attacker can read all data the affected component holds, or the most sensitive parts of it.
    High
  • Integrity impactAn attacker can change any data or files the affected component protects.
    High
  • Availability impactAn attacker can take the component down completely or keep it from serving anyone.
    High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CISA's assessmentSSVC, from the CVE record
ExploitationActive

Attackers are exploiting this in the wild.

AutomatableNo

At least one step needs hands-on work, which slows mass attacks.

Technical impactTotal

A successful attack gives full control over the affected software or all of its data.

Public exploits

1 found
0 Metasploit1 Exploit-DB0 Scanner template0 GitHub PoCs

Links are to third-party code: never run it outside an isolated lab.

Timeline

  1. 2019-07-26
    Exploit published on Exploit-DB
    Microsoft Windows 7 build 7601 (x86) - Local Privilege Escalation
  2. 2019-07-29
    CVE published
    CVE List
  3. 2022-03-15
    Added to CISA KEV
    Confirmed exploitation in the wild

Social

2026-10-22: 0 posts2026-10-23: 0 posts2026-10-24: 0 posts2026-10-25: 0 posts2026-10-26: 0 posts2026-10-27: 0 posts2026-10-28: 0 posts2026-10-29: 0 posts2026-10-30: 0 posts2026-10-31: 0 posts2026-11-01: 0 posts2026-11-02: 0 posts2026-11-03: 0 posts2026-11-04: 0 posts

No posts seen yet on X, Bluesky, Mastodon, Hacker News or GitHub.

Vendor statements

Quoted
CloudflareWAF Managed RulesBefore feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.

AWSAWS WAF Managed RulesBefore feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.

Microsoft AzureFront Door and Application Gateway WAF (DRS)No public claim

We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. The rule tables name CVEs but carry no dates, so Azure is left out of every time-to-rule figure.

Google CloudCloud Armor preconfigured WAF rulesBefore feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.

FastlyNext-Gen WAF virtual patchesBefore feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.

F5Attack signatures (Distributed Cloud WAF)Before feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.

AkamaiApp & API Protector (Adaptive Security Engine)No public source

This vendor publishes no machine-readable rule changelog we can check.

OWASP CRSCore Rule Set (open source, used inside many WAFs)Before feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.