Access-Token in ElasticJob UI causes password disclosure
Not confirmed exploited. 1 of 8 rule sources name it; Cloudflare blocks by default. Our CRS test: not blocked.
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI allows an attacker who has guest account to do privilege escalation. This issue affects Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI… More
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI allows an attacker who has guest account to do privilege escalation. This issue affects Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI 3.x version 3.0.0 and prior versions.
Edge coverage
Claimed by vendorsAsk Vigil
AI · answers from this pageWorkers AI (Llama 3.3). Can be wrong: check the cited source.
Public exploits
1 found- NucleiCVE-2022-22733.yamldetection template, replayed in our lab
Links are to third-party code: never run it outside an isolated lab.
Timeline
- 2022-01-20CVE publishedCVE List
- 2025-01-06Cloudflare ships a ruleApache ShardingSphere - Remote Code Execution - CVE:CVE-2022-22733
- 2026-11-02Our test: OWASP Core Rule Set let it throughparanoia level 1, anomaly threshold 5, default CRS settings
- 2026-11-02Our test: OWASP Core Rule Set let it throughparanoia level 2, anomaly threshold 5, default CRS settings
Vendor statements
QuotedCloudflareWAF Managed Rules
First rule 2025-01-06, 1082 days after the CVE was published.
Apache ShardingSphere - Remote Code Execution - CVE:CVE-2022-22733. Previous action: Log. New action: Block. New Detection
AWSAWS WAF Managed Rules
We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. AWS often describes a vulnerability without naming its CVE (for example "Log4j"). We count only entries that name the CVE, so AWS coverage is understated.
Microsoft AzureFront Door and Application Gateway WAF (DRS)
We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. The rule tables name CVEs but carry no dates, so Azure is left out of every time-to-rule figure.
Google CloudCloud Armor preconfigured WAF rules
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
FastlyNext-Gen WAF virtual patches
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
F5Attack signatures (Distributed Cloud WAF)
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
AkamaiApp & API Protector (Adaptive Security Engine)
This vendor publishes no machine-readable rule changelog we can check.
OWASP CRSCore Rule Set (open source, used inside many WAFs)
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
Social
No posts seen yet on X, Bluesky, Mastodon, Hacker News or GitHub.