Vigilbase CVEConnect your agent

NTT DATA Corporation TERASOLUNA Global Framework and TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java (Rich)

Not in CISA KEVCVE-2022-43484

Not confirmed exploited. 1 of 8 rule sources name it.

Edge rules
1/8
Our test
No exploit yet
CVSS
7.8
EPSS
0.4% Top 64%
Posts, 14d
02026-10-21: 0 posts2026-10-22: 0 posts2026-10-23: 0 posts2026-10-24: 0 posts2026-10-25: 0 posts2026-10-26: 0 posts2026-10-27: 0 posts2026-10-28: 0 posts2026-10-29: 0 posts2026-10-30: 0 posts2026-10-31: 0 posts2026-11-01: 0 posts2026-11-02: 0 posts2026-11-03: 0 posts
Published
2022-12-05
TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version) and TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java (Rich) 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.5.1 are vulnerable to a ClassLoader manipulation vulnerability due to using the old version of Spring Framework which… More

TERASOLUNA Global Framework 1.0.0 (Public review version) and TERASOLUNA Server Framework for Java (Rich) 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.5.1 are vulnerable to a ClassLoader manipulation vulnerability due to using the old version of Spring Framework which contains the vulnerability.The vulnerability is caused by an improper input validation issue in the binding mechanism of Spring MVC. By the application processing a specially crafted file, arbitrary code may be executed with the privileges of the application.

Ask Vigil

AI · answers from this page
Ask about CVE-2022-43484: who's covered, what to patch first, how vendors compare. I cite sources and won't help with attacks.

Workers AI (Llama 3.3). Can be wrong: check the cited source.

Severity, decoded

CVSS 3.1
High · 7.8 / 10

Exploitable with local access, with no privileges and user interaction, leading to full loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability.

Needs local accessNo login neededNeeds a user to actWorks reliablyFull compromise
How the score is built8 metrics
  • Attack vectorAn attacker needs local access, or must trick a user into opening something on the machine.
    Local
  • Attack complexityNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
    Low
  • Privileges requiredNo account or login is needed.
    None
  • User interactionA user has to do something first, such as open a file or click a link.
    Required
  • ScopeThe damage stays within the vulnerable component.
    Unchanged
  • Confidentiality impactAn attacker can read all data the affected component holds, or the most sensitive parts of it.
    High
  • Integrity impactAn attacker can change any data or files the affected component protects.
    High
  • Availability impactAn attacker can take the component down completely or keep it from serving anyone.
    High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CISA's assessmentSSVC, from the CVE record
ExploitationProof of concept

Public exploit code or a detailed write-up exists, but CISA has not seen attacks.

AutomatableNo

At least one step needs hands-on work, which slows mass attacks.

Technical impactTotal

A successful attack gives full control over the affected software or all of its data.

Public exploits

None found
0 Metasploit0 Exploit-DB0 Scanner template0 GitHub PoCs

No exploit in Exploit-DB or Metasploit, and no scanner template. That lowers, but doesn't remove, the chance of mass exploitation.

Timeline

  1. 2022-12-05
    CVE published
    CVE List
  2. 2022-12-06
    F5 rule names it
    Earliest entry we can see is an update

Social

2026-10-21: 0 posts2026-10-22: 0 posts2026-10-23: 0 posts2026-10-24: 0 posts2026-10-25: 0 posts2026-10-26: 0 posts2026-10-27: 0 posts2026-10-28: 0 posts2026-10-29: 0 posts2026-10-30: 0 posts2026-10-31: 0 posts2026-11-01: 0 posts2026-11-02: 0 posts2026-11-03: 0 posts

No posts seen yet on X, Bluesky, Mastodon, Hacker News or GitHub.

Vendor statements

Quoted
CloudflareWAF Managed RulesBefore feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.

AWSAWS WAF Managed RulesNo public claim

We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. AWS often describes a vulnerability without naming its CVE (for example "Log4j"). We count only entries that name the CVE, so AWS coverage is understated.

Microsoft AzureFront Door and Application Gateway WAF (DRS)No public claim

We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. The rule tables name CVEs but carry no dates, so Azure is left out of every time-to-rule figure.

Google CloudCloud Armor preconfigured WAF rulesBefore feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.

FastlyNext-Gen WAF virtual patchesBefore feed history

The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.

F5Attack signatures (Distributed Cloud WAF)2 quotesRule published

Named by 2022-12-06; the first entry is an update, so the rule may be older.

2022-12-06Updated200004172Source
Updated: signature 200004172 "Apache Struts ClassLoader code injection (parameter)" (Server Side Code Injection, risk High), systems: Apache Struts. References: CVE-2014-0094, CVE-2014-0112, CVE-2014-0113, CVE-2014-0114, CVE-2014-0116, CVE-2022-43484.
2023-12-12Updated200004172Source
Updated: signature 200004172 "Apache Struts ClassLoader code injection" (Server Side Code Injection, risk High), systems: Apache Struts. References: CVE-2014-0094, CVE-2014-0112, CVE-2014-0113, CVE-2014-0114, CVE-2014-0116, CVE-2022-43484.
AkamaiApp & API Protector (Adaptive Security Engine)No public source

This vendor publishes no machine-readable rule changelog we can check.

OWASP CRSCore Rule Set (open source, used inside many WAFs)No public claim

We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. CRS rarely names CVEs: it relies on generic detections. Our own lab measures what it actually blocks.