Hitachi Vantara Pentaho BA Server Authorization Bypass Vulnerability
Exploited since 2025-03-03. 2 of 8 rule sources name it; Cloudflare blocks by default. Our CRS test: not blocked.
Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 9.4.0.1 and 9.3.0.2, including 8.3.x contain security restrictions using non-canonical URLs which can be circumvented.
Edge coverage
Claimed by vendorsAsk Vigil
AI · answers from this pageWorkers AI (Llama 3.3). Can be wrong: check the cited source.
Severity, decoded
CVSS 3.1Exploitable over the network, with no privileges and no user interaction, leading to low impact on confidentiality and integrity and full loss of availability.
How the score is built
- Attack vectorAn attacker can reach it over the internet; no access to your network needed.Network
- Attack complexityNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.Low
- Privileges requiredNo account or login is needed.None
- User interactionNo one has to click or open anything; the attack works on its own.None
- ScopeThe damage stays within the vulnerable component.Unchanged
- Confidentiality impactAn attacker can read some data, but has no control over what they get.Low
- Integrity impactAn attacker can change some data, but with limited control or limited effect.Low
- Availability impactAn attacker can take the component down completely or keep it from serving anyone.High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:HAttackers are exploiting this in the wild.
Attackers can script the attack end to end and hit many targets at once.
A successful attack gives limited control over the affected software or limited access to its data.
Public exploits
3 found- MetasploitPentaho Business Server Auth Bypass and Server Side Template Injection RCE2023-04-04 · exploit · rank Excellent · has check
- Exploit-DBPentaho BA Server EE 9.3.0.0-428 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) (Unauthenticated)2023-04-08 · webapps · jsp
- NucleiCVE-2022-43939.yamldetection template, replayed in our lab
Links are to third-party code: never run it outside an isolated lab.
Timeline
- 2023-04-03CVE publishedCVE List
- 2023-04-04Metasploit module publishedPentaho Business Server Auth Bypass and Server Side Template Injection RCE
- 2023-04-08Exploit published on Exploit-DBPentaho BA Server EE 9.3.0.0-428 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) (Unauthenticated)
- 2025-03-03Added to CISA KEVConfirmed exploitation in the wild
- 2025-03-17Cloudflare rule names itEarliest entry we can see is an update
- 2025-06-30F5 ships a ruleHitachi Vantara Pentaho SSTI
- 2026-11-02Our test: OWASP Core Rule Set let it throughparanoia level 1, anomaly threshold 5, default CRS settings
- 2026-11-02Our test: OWASP Core Rule Set let it throughparanoia level 2, anomaly threshold 5, default CRS settings
Vendor statements
QuotedCloudflareWAF Managed Rules
Named by 2025-03-17; the first entry is an update, so the rule may be older.
Pentaho - Template Injection - CVE:CVE-2022-43769, CVE:CVE-2022-43939. Previous action: Log. New action: Block.
AWSAWS WAF Managed Rules
We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. AWS often describes a vulnerability without naming its CVE (for example "Log4j"). We count only entries that name the CVE, so AWS coverage is understated.
Microsoft AzureFront Door and Application Gateway WAF (DRS)
We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. The rule tables name CVEs but carry no dates, so Azure is left out of every time-to-rule figure.
Google CloudCloud Armor preconfigured WAF rules
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
FastlyNext-Gen WAF virtual patches
The CVE predates the oldest entry in this vendor's public feed, so a rule may exist that we cannot see.
F5Attack signatures (Distributed Cloud WAF)
First rule 2025-06-30, 819 days after the CVE was published.
Added: signature 200204014 "Hitachi Vantara Pentaho SSTI" (Server Side Code Injection, risk High), systems: Java Servlets/JSP, Other Web Server. References: CVE-2022-43939, CVE-2022-43769.
AkamaiApp & API Protector (Adaptive Security Engine)
This vendor publishes no machine-readable rule changelog we can check.
OWASP CRSCore Rule Set (open source, used inside many WAFs)
We found no public statement from this vendor naming this CVE. That is not proof of no protection: generic rules may still catch it. CRS rarely names CVEs: it relies on generic detections. Our own lab measures what it actually blocks.
Social
No posts seen yet on X, Bluesky, Mastodon, Hacker News or GitHub.